27.6.07

Oracle results - above market expectations

After the close of markets yesterday Oracle announced the results of its fiscal year 2007, which ended on May 31st. Q4 GAAP revenues rose 20% to $5.8 billion, quarterly GAAP net income was up 23% to $1.6 billion, GAAP new license revenues were up 17% to $2.5 billion and EPS was up 27% to $0.31 basic per share. For fiscal 2007 as a whole GAAP revenues rose 25% t $18 billion, GAAP net income was up 26% to $4.3 billion, GAAP new licence revenues were up 20% to $5.9 billion, and EPS rose 27% to 0.83 basic per share. Cash flow from operation, crucial to sustain and continue the aggressive acquisition strategy, expanded by $1 billion to $5.5 billion.

These are impressive figures and ones that will be forensically analysed by the competition, trying to factor out acquisition led growth from organic growth and to calculate the implications for individual products in individual countries. Oracle is now such a large organisation, with so many product lines and has made so many acquisitions that this exercise is becoming harder and harder each quarter, generating progressively less insight. The prime obfuscating factor in any such analysis is revenue recognition - Oracle is more conservative in terms of revenue recognition that many of the companies that it acquires. Analysis of the Oracle results is most effective when the macro-level analysis of the numbers is blended with detail knowledge at the deal specific level, below the information publicly provided by Oracle.

The colour to the numbers was given by Charles Philips. There were three areas that were headlined. First, was the continued strength of the Oracle technology business, including the traditional database technology. That strength is driven by steady database growth, uptake of "Options" on the database product and continued acceleration of revenues from Fusion middleware - with the latter two being the prime revenue accelerators. In terms of geographic colour EMEA was strongest at 18% year-on-year growth, followed by the Americas and APAC at 15% and 13% respectively. Second, were the applications growth figures with the Americas, EMEA and APAC growing at 26%, 42% and 36% respectively. The vertical applications are undoubtedly an element of that growth, with EMEA now showing the growth spurt that the Americas experienced earlier - extending the channel and sales operations for industry vertical products is inherently more difficult in a geographically and culturally fragmented market such as EMEA. The vertical applications have also been used to effect a subtle change of positioning in the battle against SAP - moving their strategy gently from a head-to-head tussle towards trying to envelop and subsequently replace them. We expect more focus on this enveloping strategy in 2008. Third, was the mention of the growing importance of CRM On Demand for Oracle. Charles Phillips made special mention of the disadvantages of a multi-tenant architecture when dealing with sensitive customer data in the financial services or public services markets - a clear prod in the ribs for Salesforce.com and, potentially, an early signal that Oracle will begin to address this market more aggressively.

Below the headlines there are always one or two seemingly low key announcements on the results conference call that are actually quite significant. This time was no exception. The technology re-marketer programme mentioned, almost in passing, by Charles Phillips is a signal of a much harder push into the SMB market, attempting to remove friction from the channel and increase channel velocity. Oracle has traditionally been difficult to do business with for small companies and the re-sellers that serve them. As a result the SMB revenues, although not unimportant at current levels, are a fraction of the potential in that market. Expect 2008 to see Oracle push into the Microsoft strongholds during 2008. It's a continuation of the SMB technology battle between Microsoft and Oracle that Ovum first focused on in 2005 - with 2008 signalling increased fervour to the battle.

Oracle is definitely still on the acquisition trail, with the executive team confirming that they expect the 2008 M&A momentum to be as strong as it was in 2007. On that basis we should anticipate a double digit number of acquisitions in the year ahead. There are two prime candidates where these acquisitions will come from. First, is further specialist applications in its target vertical markets, with utilities and energy being a prime candidate. Second, continued infill acquisitions in middleware technology, to further build out its rapidly growing middleware market and continue the strong competition against the likes of IBM.

However, there are also likely to be twists and turns in the acquisition strategy. Oracle will surely expand the number of vertical markets that it focuses on and set out a new acquisition trail in those markets; potentially targeting markets considered to be SAP dominated. The market must also face up to the possibility of a totally left-field acquisition, taking Oracle into new markets entirely. Oracle has floated the idea of it attaining annual revenues of $50 billion. This will potentially require more than continued organic growth and numerous sub-$1 billion acquisitions. The acquisition of PeopleSoft signalled a change of strategic gear for Oracle and a push for major growth. 2008 or 2009 could well signal another change of gear for Oracle.

Author: David Mitchell


Read more ...

26.6.07

Oracle and LODESTAR

On April 24, 2007, Oracle announced our agreement to acquire LODESTAR Corporation ("LODESTAR"), a leading provider of meter data management and competitive energy operation solutions. We expect the transaction to close in May 2007, subject to certain closing conditions. Until such time, each company will continue to operate independently.

LODESTAR delivers best-in-class meter data management, commercial and industrial (C&I) billing, load research, load forecasting and pricing, load profiling, and settlement and transaction management solutions to the utilities industry. The strengths of LODESTAR's solutions for utilities are planned to be combined with Oracle's industry leading database, middleware, and enterprise applications, including Oracle Utilities applications acquired through SPLWorldGroup. Combined, we plan to deliver the most comprehensive suite of mission critical operational systems for all segments of the utilities industry, combining meter data management, load profiling, pricing, marketing, sales, customer care, billing, analytics and management of the networks, work force, assets, and business to business transactions. We are also committed to supporting our respective customers, which include over 2,500 utilities worldwide, and 10 of the top 10 Global electric and gas companies.

On 6/1/2007, Oracle completed the acquisition of LODESTAR Corporation.

LODESTAR Corporation encompasses over 25 years of industry experience, spanning a customer base that includes the largest electricity and gas companies around the world. Our partnerships with these companies have allowed LODESTAR to stay in the forefront of the industry with leading energy software solutions.

Recognized globally for our suite of applications, LODESTAR Customer Choice Suite (CCS) is the cornerstone of many energy companies' mission critical applications. The CCS advantage lies in the ability to provide scalability and flexibility. Most solutions to date cannot handle the complexity involved in handling energy data. Thus, resources are consumed where they could be better utilized elsewhere. Because LODESTAR has applications that require configuration only around customer specific requirements, a business reduces expenditure as well as install time.

LODESTAR understands a business' need to forge ahead competitively. This is why we are dedicated to offering the industry software solutions that easily integrate into the entire enterprise. Our applications work easily with other third party packages and can easily be changed by your internal staff or with the help of a LODESTAR implementation specialist.

Chris Hamilos, Chairman and CEO had the vision to create a component-based suite of products to address the demands imposed by the ever-changing and dynamic energy markets worldwide. The first product to manage load research was introduced by LODESTAR Corporation (as part of TASC) in 1978. Since that time we have evolved our offerings into more than 10 different products that include portfolio management, financial management, pricing, billing, contract management, transaction management and more.
We lead with boldness, passion, speed and innovation. Our focus is to continuously provide the technology that makes a difference. We offer flexibility, efficiency, knowledge and over 70 years combined experience in our management team.

Source: www.oracle.com & www.lodestarcorp.com


Read more ...

25.6.07

Multinational Corporation ERP Implementation – Microsoft Business Solutions Great Plains

If you look back to the history, you will see that ERP for large publicly traded company had to be built upon very reliable hardware (more likely non-Intel hardware: mainframe, Sun sparc, etc.), powerful database platform: Oracle, DB2, Ingress, Sybase and reliable OS: UNIX. 10 years ago Microsoft had Windows NT first tries, plus Windows 95 was kind of revolution, but not the one to stake on for corporate users. Nowadays hardware (from Intel side), Windows 2003 Server Enterprise Edition, WindowsXP Pro, and Microsoft SQL Server could be considered reasonably reliable plus it is certainly easier to support these products, because of the large pool of Microsoft-oriented IT professionals available Worldwide. Microsoft Business Solutions offers several lines of ERP systems: Microsoft Great Plains, Microsoft Navision, Solomon, Axapta. We don’t want to state here that in the future Microsoft will be only ERP systems provider, but it certainly is and will be one of the major players on the ERP/MRP market. In this small article we’ll consider the ways to implement large corporation required features in Microsoft Great Plains.

• GL Consolidation. If you do business exclusively in the USA – you probably do not need this, however if you have to operate in the multicurrency and under multiple countries regulations – you need this feature. European ERPs of late 1990th had this GL consolidation as separate module. Microsoft Great Plains doesn’t have this feature out of the box, and you have to implement it via MS SQL Server Data Transformation package, Stored Procedure or Great Plains Dexterity customization. The alternative approach is to use Enterprise Reporting or FRx with multicurrency to provide consolidated reporting

• Internal Audit reports. Internal Auditor should be provided with reliable random selection of documents to review. Great Plains is MS SQL Server based application and if you base your Crystal Report on the stored procedure in SQL Server – you can easily get random selection
• Intercompanies Transactions. This is probably complicated with multicurrency – but Great Plains has the module to address this issue

• Customer/Vendor Consolidation. You might deal through agents on your local or regional markets and based on the results you pay the agent or subtract from it. This feature is covered in Customer/Vendor Consolidation module

• Multiple languages support. Great Plains had support to all the major languages in version 6.0. When Microsoft acquired Navision Software – it staked on Navision in continental Europe and all the emerging markets (Russia, East Europe, Brazil, China). The way you implement local language or Unicode characters support – you translate several screens for GP local users and extend Dexterity with Unicode enabling software utility.

Do your homework with regards to implementation, customization, integration and if you have issues or concerns – we are here to help! If you want us to do the job - give us a call +420 724 160 427 or ask for info@espaceconsulting.eu

Author: Andrew Karasev


Read more ...